|
| |
Communication - The Key to Solving Conflicts
Successful
communication is one of the keys to constructively dealing with conflicts.
"He who talks, holds his fire": a reduction to this one common
denominator is a frequent way of summing up the function of communication.
In professionalised or even ritual form, communication plays a key role in
all conciliation and arbitration processes. Subsequently, imparting
communicative skills is central to peace education.
Communication is disrupted or heavily affected in conflicts. How can
communication be approached in a first step to make a common view of the
problem feasible, so that the fundamental conflicting problem can be
understood.
The initial requirement for this is the will to add another, fresh
viewpoint to your own field of perception, and to attempt to understand
what the other party means. There is no room for threats, blame or
assertions here. These factors need to be replaced by cooperative patterns
of explanation and understanding.
Various
aids can be useful for this:
 |
Advance
discussions/framework discussions serving to smooth the way and make decisions on
locations, meetings and procedures without approaching the conflict in
itself. |
 |
Other
(neutral) surroundings which ensure that no one has a 'home advantage'; a modified, external
framework can also make a change in relations feasible. |
 |
Specific
and accepted rules: non-structured communication between (hostile) parties to a conflict
can easily lead to uncontrolled escalation. The application of agreed
rules allows the parties to come into contact with one another again. |
 |
Third
parties: they
act as catalysts, ensure that rules are upheld and attempt to contribute
to settling the conflict without taking sides or submitting themselves to
the fundamental question of the conflict. |
|
|
Communication
Rules Provide Aid in Conflicting Situations
 |
Talk
about yourself, use the first person singular. |
 |
Keep to
the point, do not insult, hurt or provoke the other party. |
 |
Recognize the
needs of the other party. |
 |
Keep to
the subject, do not stray. |
 |
Let the
other party have his say, listen and do not interrupt. |
 |
Search
for a common solution. |
 |
Keep to
the agreed rules. |
Words
Trigger Both Positive and Negative Emotions - Be Aware of This
What
emotions are triggered in you when someone
 |
Gives
you orders (“stop that now.”) |
 |
Threatens
you ("if you don't stop that now, I will) |
 |
Tells
you ("you can't do that.”) |
 |
Accuses
you ("you’re always so loud.”). |
 |
Judges
your behavior ("you provoke me continually.”) |
 |
Interrogates
you ("where were you yesterday evening?”)
|
|
|
What is
More or Less Helpful in a Conflict Discussion?
|
The
following are helpful and have a de-escalating effect
|
The
following are less helpful and have a escalating effect
|
|
Consciously
saying hello and goodbye |
Not
saying hello, not saying goodbye |
|
Eye
contact |
Lack of
eye contact |
|
Argumentation
and reasoning |
Justifying
yourself |
|
Trying
to grasp what the other party is saying |
Making
accusations |
|
The
ability to convince |
Putting
things off |
|
Finding
approval |
Talking
at cross-purposes |
|
Enquiring |
Trying
to convince |
|
Drawing
attention to your own vulnerability |
Showing
no interest |
|
Allowing
the other party to have his say |
Butting
in |
|
Avoiding
emotive words |
Using
emotive words |
|
An
attentive, open body posture |
An
inattentive, closed body posture |
|
Humor |
Humourlessness,
embitteredness |
|
Having
time |
Having
no time |
|
Taking
conflicting arguments seriously |
Only
seeing your own side of things |
|
Separating
the personal and the factual |
Personal
attacks |
Body Language in Conflict
Body
language plays a central role in conflict de-escalation and constructively
settling conflicts. Besides facial and bodily expressions, body
language includes your tone of voice, clothing and the manner in which
rooms are decorated.
Social psychologist, Siegfried Frey, from
Duisburg in Germany, supports the view that
non-verbal and verbal expression play a central role for people in the
communication process. Body language is understood by the recipient on an
unconscious level and taken as a reason for acting.
Shaking hands as a daily ritual of politeness hindered your opponent in
hitting you in ancient times. Barrier signals (for instance folding your
arms) allow you to maintain your distance and is also perceived in this
manner, while balled fists communicate determination and drive.
Credibility, reconciliation and apology require an 'open' body posture in
order to be recognised and accepted as such.
Symbolic actions play a particularly important role in ending conflicts,
both in the private and public sphere. Gestures of humility and
reconciliation signalise that the phase of confrontation has come to an
end, and that a new phase in the relationship has begun.
Non-verbal body language is of central meaning to constructively dealing
with conflicts, since signs of escalation or de-escalation can be given
here, both at a conscious and unconscious level.
What always has to be taken into consideration here is that non-verbal
communication is culturally specific and not universal. Its specific
meaning depends on the respective cultural context. |
|
Learning
Body Language
In
conflicting situations, partners in conflict also communicate their
mutual attitudes in essential terms using body language. Body language
constitutes a direct expression even if we claim something else in
words. Misunderstandings and problems can easily result if feelings
are wrongly expressed or perceived.
The
following are elements of body language:
 |
Facial expressions |
 |
Bodily expressions |
 |
Body posture |
 |
Clothing and jewellery |
 |
Distance and space |
Practice:
We
express the following emotions through body language:
Aggression
- anger - threat - violence - coolness - waiting and seeing - fear -
submission - boredom - softness - hardness - openness - closedness -
indecision - assertive ability - stress - tension - relaxedness -
ability to compromise - explicitness - ambiguity.
Comment on approach:
Each term is written on a sheet of paper. The participants receive two
sheets of paper with the terms written on them and use pantomime to
act them out. The other members of the group attempt to divulge the
term being referred to. Appraisal takes place in relation to two
questions:
 |
(How)
can feelings be expressed in such a way that others are capable of
understanding them and reacting appropriately? |
 |
Is it
possible to perceive and interpret other people’s feelings
correctly?
|
|
|
[Autor: Günther Gugel, Tübingen
Institute for Peace Education; Editor: Ragnar Müller]
[Back to
top of page]
|